A Day in Two Workflows by TechnoXander
AML Investigation in the UK and Europe: One Analyst, Two Versions of the Same Day
This is a hypothetical, written for illustration. The same analyst receives the same alert on the same Tuesday, once in a manual workflow and once in an assisted one. The point is where the time goes, which is the heart of AML investigation throughput.
| Time | Manual workflow | Assisted workflow |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00 | Alert opens. Rule name and account number. | Alert opens with customer history and earlier cases shown. |
| 09:30 | Searches three systems for earlier cases. | Reviews the earlier cases and what they concluded. |
| 11:00 | Copies identifiers and builds a timeline in a spreadsheet. | Checks a draft chronology against source records. |
| 13:00 | Starts to assess the activity. | Already weighing whether the explanation holds. |
| 15:00 | Decides. Writes the note quickly. | Decides. Writes the reasoning in full. |
Slides that walk through this are here: One Alert, Two Workflows. A diagram of where freed time should go: Where freed hours should go.
What does not change
A person decides, and the firm remains accountable. That is also the pattern in practice: the Bank of England and FCA's 2026 survey found that most AI agents at responding firms recommend actions while humans decide. The context behind this is in why alerts arrive without context.
Conclusion
The same judgement, started earlier. TechnoXander builds investigation tooling so the analyst's morning starts with the picture, not the search.
Hypothetical illustration. General information, not legal advice.
Comments
Post a Comment